Polli Schildge
Director APCSC

Transportation Equity in Our City
Polli Schildge
Director APCSC
E-moto crashes were erroneously reported as e-bike crashes (and most involved a car!) prompting the ridiculous NJ e-bike law. It finally looks hopeful that this new bill will focus on safety standards for e-motos, allowing people who use pedal assist to ride their bikes without pointless restrictions.
A bill in the state Legislature would lift some of the most controversial and restrictive requirements of New Jersey’s new e-bike law by deregulating the slowest low speed models.
=>>To help make this bill into a law please call or write your state senators: https://www.njleg.state.nj.us/districts


The measure, introduced on Oct. 15 by state Sen. Raj Mukherji, D-Hudson, would also amend the current law to remove a requirement for a person to register and obtain a license to operate a low-speed class 1 or 2 electric bicycle.
“E-bikes are a sustainable transit option transforming how New Jerseyans commute, work, and navigate our communities, but our laws need to distinguish between what’s essentially a pedal bicycle with a little electric assistance and a powerful motorized vehicle capable of endangering pedestrians and riders alike,” Mukherji said in a statement.
Read all about it here:
Onward!
Polli Schildge, Editor, Director Asbury Park Complete Streets Coalition
E-motos are unregulated electric motorcycles, They can reach speeds over 50mph.
E-bikes are low-speed and low watts, and are often a great option for mobility for elderly, parents, and people with disabilities.
Please take this short survey to share how you travel and what safety concerns you have across the city:
Many of us walk and roll in Asbury Park for a healthy, convenient, and fun transportation option outside of a car in this small city by the sea. Some travel by bike or walk as the main mode of transportation.
How about you?
Do you ever walk or roll in Asbury Park?Getting around on foot or on two wheels should be a safe alternative to driving. As part of the AP Traffic Safety Action Plan, the city is hosting a public outreach event on Thursday, June 25 from 6pm to 8pm in City Council Chambers at 1 Municipal Plaza.
Learn about how we can improve safety for everyone who walks, rolls, (and drives) through the city.
Parking in the City Hall lot will be free for all attendees.
Please come!
Love to know your thoughts and concerns.
See you on Thursday!
Onward~
Polli Schildge
Editor, Director APCSC

Governor Murphy is a self-proclaimed transit advocate, and has conveyed his commitment to saving lives on NJ roads by signing the NJ Target Zero Bill into law and forming the Target Zero Commission, which has been working to eliminate NJ road deaths by 2040.
This e-bike law S4834/A6235 will now undermine the work of the Target Zero Commission.
Making it difficult for people to access low-speed e-bike transportation, this law will lead to more reliance on cars, and continue to reserve the majority of road space for drivers, which will lead to more crashes, injuries and deaths.
Restricting low-speed e-bikes will not address the real problem of high-speed e-motos and cars, and will not help make our streets safer.
Residents of Asbury Park who don’t own cars deserve to have the option to use pedal-assist, low-speed e-bikes without prohibitive restrictions.
NJ already has a 2019 law that requires registration, a license, and insurance for Class 3 e-bikes, which has NEVER been implemented as it should have been.
Conflating low-speed e-bikes with high-speed e-motos is misguided, and inequitable.
NJBWC and APCSC will continue to oppose this bill and work with legislators and Governor Sherrill to create a bill that will offer practical solutions to regulate high-speed e-motos, promote the expansion of safe micro-mobility, and continue addressing the real threats to NJ’s streets, CARS, the cause of 99% of our fatal crashes, not low speed e-bikes.
Please call the sponsors and co-sponsors of the bill, and the senators and Assembly members below, and voice opposition to S4834 / A6235 :
⭐Senator Nicholas Scutari (Primary Sponsor and Senate President):(732)-827- 7480
⭐Senator Vin Gopal (Key Co-sponsor ): (732) 704-3808
⭐Senator Raj Mukherji (Co-sponsor): (201) 626-4000
Senator Angela V. McKnight: (201) 360-2502
Senator Brian P. Stack: (201) 721-5263
Assemblywoman Margie Donlon: (732) 704-3808
Assemblywoman Luanne Peterpaul: (732) 704-3808
Assemblyman James Kennedy: (732)-943-2660
Assemblywoman Linda Carter: (908) 561-5757
As the statewide advocacy organization for safer streets, NJ Bike & Walk Coalition is working to create a more bikeable, walkable, and rollable NJ, which will make streets and roads safer for all.
Please support NJBWC: https://njbwc.org/join/
Onward~
Polli Schildge
Director APCSC
Monmouth County is developing a Safe Streets for All Safety Action Plan to make our roads safer for everyone – whether you walk, bike, drive, or take public transit.
We hope you’ll share your input on this submit his short Safe Streets Monmouth Community Survey
Please use this interactive map to show us where you feel unsafe or where safety improvement is needed.
YOU are the LOCAL EXPERTS on the key issues and concerns related to traffic safety in Monmouth County.
Your input is important and will guide strategies to reduce serious crashes and build a stronger Culture of Safety across the County.
Please submit before January 31st.
Please note that all responses are confidential and the entire survey should take 5-10 minutes to complete. When you finish your survey, please make sure to share it with your neighbors and community to ensure maximum participation.
Thanks SO much!
Onward!
Polli Schildge, Editor, & Director APCSC
Asbury Park Complete Streets Coalition strongly opposes legislation requiring licensin
Take action: Save Low-Speed E-Bikes! Stop S4834 / A6235
S4834 /A6235:
Regulates ALL motorized bicycles, with no distinctin between classes 1-2 and 3. This means even low speed pedal assist bikes, which would be regulated along with high speed e-motos: Senator Nichols Scutari’s e-bike bill would also require a license to operate low-speed (class 1 and 2) e-bikes.
“E-bike” is a generic term that lumps together everything with two wheels and an electric motor and can include a variety of devices including electric bicycles, electric mopeds, scooters, electric dirt bikes and electric motorcycles. These are all different vehicle types and their differences need to be taken into account when developing appropriate laws and regulations to govern their safe use on public roads and trails. Let’s dig into electric bicycles and “e-motos” to understand how they are currently regulated and where the issues are actually arising.” People For Bikes: It’s An E-Moto Problem
E-bikes are a game changer for residents who cannot afford cars, many of whom are immigrants, elderly or have disabilities – nearly 25% of the population in the city lives at or near the “poverty line”, and many need to ride bikes as their main transportation.
Legislative focus on the dangers of e-bikes is a distraction from the 40k people a year who die in car crashes. Globally 1.5 million people are killed by cars (and many more by the effects of pollution, noise, tire rubber particles, and climate change they produce.)
This doesn’t account for those who are seriously injured, and the families affected by the trauma and devastating financial impact of a father, mother, or child killed, insurmountable hospital bills, maybe displaced from their homes.
The numbers of vulnerable road users are disproportionately people of color and poor people. In NJ there were 695 traffic deaths, and a significant rise in pedestrian deaths. For the current year (2025), as of early December, there were already 281 fatalities in 263 crashes, showing a continued high rate of road deaths.
Death by car is the leading cause of death for people aged 5 to 29, close to the number killed by guns in the U.S. in 2021, but the issue of systemic car fatalities barely registers in political debates when compared to debates over firearms.
The sensationalized NYT article, “The Shocking Crash That Led One County to Reckon With the Dangers of E-Bikes makes it seem like proof of the “e-bike menace”. The problem is inconsistent, unclear state-by-state regulation. And articles like this one that fail to acknowledge that car crashes account for vastly more vehicular deaths – over forty thousand people a year in the US, both inside and outside of cars which has become normalized. It’s not news.
In three of the 4 recent tragic NJ e-bike incidents, the e-bike riders were hit by the driver of a car, truck, or a van, and one was intentional – so e-bikes themselves were not to blame at all.
The title of the NYT article is a perfect example of vilifying e-bikes – but we never see details like this about a car crash death in the media. Deaths and near death of a person in a car crash isn’t “shocking” because it happens every day, and it’s been happening for a hundred years.
When automobiles were first introduced in the US on city streets and country roads, CARS were deemed a menace. So in the 1920s the titans of the auto industry literally met up and took action to make way for more cars everywhere by moving people off the streets with concepts like “jaywalking”, tearing down neighborhoods to build highways, building suburbs with no easy direct access to services or amenities without a car, making all other modes (example trolleys) obsolete, and even stigmatizing transit, like implying that buses are for poor people.

Peter Norton is the author of Fighting Traffic The Dawn of the Motor Age in the American City. Norton was shaken early in his career reading an article in a 1920s engineering magazine when cars were taking over city streets, “The obvious solution … lies only in a radical revision of our conception of what a city street is for.”
This deep dive Yale University Climate Connections article cites Peter Norton: American society wasn’t always so car-centric. Our future doesn’t have to be, either.
We must reduce reliance on cars by offering transportation options, and if legislation makes it harder to accommodate e-bikes, this country will continue to be dominated by cars.

Cars have taken over cities and towns to our peril.
We now have micro mobility options which we should be vigorously supporting, but the auto industry is threatened…it’s not going to be easy.
E-bikes must be classified clearly, and infrastructure must be built to accommodate pedal bikes, e-bikes and walking safely, enabling all modes outside of cars to access road space equitably. It’s a socialized approach to road use. High speed e-motos need separate designation, as well as regulation.
Let’s make sure they get the message clearly.
Please call or email your opposition to S4834 / A6235 :
Senator Nicholas Scutari (732)-827- 7480
Assemblyman James Kennedy (732)-943-2660
Assemblywoman Linda Carter (908) 561-5757
Senator Vin Gopal: (732) 704-3808
Assemblywoman Margie Donlon (732) 704-3808
Assemblywoman Luanne Peterpaul (732) 704-3808
Here is the Transportation Committee’s statement following passage through Thursday’s committee meeting.Here is the full bill which includes some amendments from the Transportation Committee:
TOMORROW! The e-bike bill S4834 is on the agenda of the Budget and Appropriations Committee for Monday, 12/8 at 1pm.
Simple text: I oppose S4384. Increased regulatory burden of S4834 would discourage all e‑bike adoption, and conflict with NJDOT efforts to expand micro mobility, and to mitigate reliance on cars.
Here’s a previous thought piece on the subject on the APCSC website: The E-Bike Problem.
Onward~
Polli Schildge, Editor
This article which was published yesterday in StreetsblogUSA is timely, in light of the recent PSA in Asbury Park about people riding bikes on the sidewalk.
In any city, people will opt to ride on the sidewalk if existing bicycling infrastructure doesn’t feel safe, and if streets are designed to be primarily devoted to driving. AP currently has scraps of unconnected bicycling infrastructure – door zone bike lanes between parked cars and traffic, and bike lanes squeezed between parked cars and the curb.
E-bikes on sidewalks are a particular concern. Let’s focus on the solution. The city can boldly implement traffic calming measures to slow cars, offer more alternatives to driving, and build walking and biking infrastructure that welcomes all vulnerable users in a safe environment – which will also make the city safer for drivers too.
The article explains the distinction between e-bikes, and e-moto bikes.
Many cities are lumping together any bicycles with an electric motor, which leads to legislation against every type of e-bike.
Let’s dive in…
PART I: The E-Bike ‘Problem’ is an E-Moto Problem
PeopleForBikes separates fact from fiction to protect the future of e-bikes in America in this new series. PeopleForBikes’ primarily focuses on safety: product safety, safe places to ride, and safety education for cyclists and e-cyclists.
“Who Is Responsible For The E-Moto Problem?
It’s the Wild West in the electric bike world because of rapidly evolving products and the patchwork of regulations.
“The E-moto problem is caused by E-moto manufacturers and sellers. The companies that make, import and sell e-motos are attempting to skirt legal and safety requirements for motor vehicles in order to sell their products.”
The intention of the manufacturers is to deceive the public into believing their e-moto is an electric bicycle or “e-bike”. Example: manufacturers are adding fake pedals to e-motos so they fly under the radar.
Three Class Model Law defines what is, and is not, an electric bicycle, or e-bike.
| What’s Legal and What’s Not: Electric Bicycle vs. E-Moto | ||
| Feature | Class 1 / 2 / 3 Electric Bicycle | E-Moto |
| Operable Pedals | Required | Not required (often fake) |
| Motor Power | ≤ 750W | Often 1,000W–6,000W+ |
| Top Speed | ≤ 20–28 mph | 30–65+ mph |
| Throttle | Class 2 only (≤ 20 mph) | Usually throttle-only |
| Licensing / Registration | No | Required (in most states) |
| Product Category | Consumer product | Motor vehicle |
| Street Legal for Minors? | Yes, in many states, depending on age | No, unless registered and licensed |
It’s critically important for cities and towns to get behind legislation in favor of micro mobility, alternative equitable transportation, thereby reducing reliance on cars.
Let’s do this Asbury Park!
Polli Schildge, Editor
Onward!
Polli Schildge, Editor, Director APCSC